Political Science Faculty Publications and Presentations
This article concerns how a critical theory of reification should be conceptualized to grasp the 2007 crisis, state-imposed austerity, and the rise of right-wing authoritarian populism. It argues that Jürgen Habermas’s, Axel Honneth’s, and Georg Lukacs’s interpretations of reification cannot provide a theoretical framework for a critical social theory of these developments due to their inadequate theories of domination, crises, character formation, and historical development. It then outlines a critical theory of reification that draws on Max Horkheimer’s notion of reified authority and contemporary Marxian critical theory’s interpretation of the critique of political economy to conceive of domination, crises, and character formation as inherent to the reproduction of capitalist society, which is characterized by a process of historical development that drives humanity into new types of barbarism. It concludes by indicating how such an approach, in contrast to Habermas’s, Honneth’s, and Lukács’s theories, provides a conception of reification that can grasp our present moment.
O’Kane, C. (2021). Reification and the Critical Theory of Contemporary Society. Critical Historical Studies, 8(1), 57–86. https://doi.org/10.1086/713522
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Critical Historical Studies
© 2021 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. Original published version available at https://doi.org/10.1086/713522