School of Earth, Environmental, and Marine Sciences Faculty Publications and Presentations
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
6-2020
Abstract
Highlights
- Identifying riverine influence on productivity in the northern Gulf of Mexico
- Use of nutrient/salinity plots to differentiate inputs from two rivers
- Verifying Rowe-Chapman (2002) hypothesis with in situ data
Abstract
Coastal ocean productivity is often dependent on riverine sources of nutrients, yet it can be difficult to determine how far the influence of the river extends. The northern Gulf of Mexico (GOM) receives freshwater and nutrients discharged mainly from the Mississippi and Atchafalaya Rivers. We used nutrient/salinity relationships to (i) differentiate the nutrient inputs of the two rivers and (ii) determine the potential extent of the zones where productivity is affected by each. We identified three different zones: one close to the coast having a linear nutrient/salinity relationship where physical forcing (river flow) dominates, one offshore with nutrient (N or Si) concentrations <1 >μM, and one between them with variable nutrient concentrations largely controlled by consumption by autotrophs. While in the GOM salinity/nutrient relationships varied systematically with distance from the two rivers in winter, this was not seen in summer. Thus, the methodology is not always applicable directly, because the boundaries of the different regions vary with river flow, overall nutrient flux, and grids of stations at the regional spatial scale (15–20 km in the GOM), rather than single sections are needed to determine boundaries.
Recommended Citation
Kim, Jongsun, et al. "Categorizing zonal productivity on the continental shelf with nutrient-salinity ratios." Journal of Marine Systems 206 (2020): 103336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2020.103336
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Publication Title
Journal of Marine Systems
DOI
10.1016/j.jmarsys.2020.103336
Comments
Original published version available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2020.103336