School of Earth, Environmental, and Marine Sciences Faculty Publications and Presentations

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

7-2023

Abstract

This work used life-cycle assessment (LCA) to determine the environmental and human health impacts of four ethanol production scenarios (S1: CaO pretreatment + H2SO4 neutralization + C6 yeast fermentation; S2: CaO pretreatment + CO2 neutralization + C6 yeast fermentation; S3: CaO pretreatment + H2SO4 neutralization + C6/C5 yeast fermentation; and S4: CaO pretreatment + CO2 neutralization + C6/C5 yeast fermentation), with the functional unit being 1 kg of 95 % ethanol. The LCA results showed that the total ozone depletion, global warming potential, smog, acidification, eutrophication, and ecotoxicity values were comparable when CO2 or H2SO4 were used to adjust the pH of CaO-pretreated slurry. However, using CO2 for neutralization and C6/C5 yeast for fermentation demonstrated significant benefits in terms of carcinogenicity, non-carcinogenicity, respiratory effect, ecotoxicity, and fossil fuel depletion. The findings indicate that the choice of chemicals and strains plays a key role in determining environmental and human health impacts.

Highlights

  • Four ethanol production scenarios were compared using LCA methodology.
  • CO2 showed lower environmental and human health impacts than H2SO4.

  • C6/C5 yeast offers more environmental and human health advantages than C6 yeast.

Comments

Original published version available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129042

Publication Title

Bioresource Technology

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129042

Available for download on Tuesday, July 01, 2025

Share

COinS