Deconstructing the Corporate Psychopath: An Examination of Deceptive Behavior

Authors

Corey A. Shank, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2018

Abstract

This paper examines whether business students deceive others more often than non-business students. A cheap talk experiment and an ethics questionnaire are employed to examine the subject’s behavior. Fundamental differences, such as psychopathic personality, are used to examine their role in deceptive and unethical behavior. The results show that business students deceive others for personal gain more often than non-business students when there is the most to gain; however, business students find deception committed by others as unethical. Business students exhibit more psychopathic tendencies compared to non-business students, including being more likely to fit the prototypical psychopath profile. This fundamental difference in psychopathy can help explain why individuals deceive others and behave unethically. These results have important implications for the business industry and the design of policies. Thus, this study endeavors to advance the literature on fundamental distinctions between those who work in high levels of organizations and how this fundamental difference impacts decision making.

Comments

© 2018, Emerald Publishing Limited. Original published version available at https://doi.org/10.1108/RBF-03-2017-0028

Recommended Citation

Shank, Corey Allen. “Deconstructing the Corporate Psychopath: An Examination of Deceptive Behavior.” Review of Behavioral Finance 10, no. 2 (January 1, 2018): 163–82. https://doi.org/10.1108/RBF-03-2017-0028.

First Page

163

Last Page

182

Publication Title

Review of Behavioral Finance

DOI

10.1108/RBF-03-2017-0028