Document Type
Article
Publication Date
3-2020
Abstract
The purpose of this qualitative study was to discover the perceived benefits and challenges of preparing principal candidates for school district/university partnerships. Data analysis from focus group interviews revealed both benefits and challenges. Themes that were perceived as benefits were: 1) increased opportunities for graduate students in educational leadership preparation programs, 2) integration of field-based experiences, 3) a supportive learning environment, and 4) networking opportunities. Conversely, challenging themes were: 1) need for school district liaison, 2) better collaboration between school district/university partnerships, 3) employment consideration for graduates of educational leadership preparation programs, and 4) better school facilities and equipment. The study concluded that school district/university partnerships are needed in order to connect theory and practice to develop well-rounded educational leaders.
Recommended Citation
Garcia, Alejandro; Manchaca, Velma; and Guerra, Frederico (2020) "School Districts and a University Principal Preparation Program Partnership: A Cohort Model," Journal of Educational Leadership in Action: Vol. 6 : Iss. 3 , Article 4. Available at: https://digitalcommons.lindenwood.edu/ela/vol6/iss3/4
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.
Publication Title
Journal of Educational Leadership
Comments
The purpose of this qualitative study was to discover the perceived benefits and challenges of preparing principal candidates for school district/university partnerships. Data analysis from focus group interviews revealed both benefits and challenges. Themes that were perceived as benefits were: 1) increased opportunities for graduate students in educational leadership preparation programs, 2) integration of field-based experiences, 3) a supportive learning environment, and 4) networking opportunities. Conversely, challenging themes were: 1) need for school district liaison, 2) better collaboration between school district/university partnerships, 3) employment consideration for graduates of educational leadership preparation programs, and 4) better school facilities and equipment. The study concluded that school district/university partnerships are needed in order to connect theory and practice to develop well-rounded educational leaders.