Teaching and Learning Faculty Publications and Presentations

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

4-2024

Abstract

Background

The theory of embodied cognition claims that body interaction with the environment change how we think and constitute cognition. Accordingly, active learning enriches learning experiences which in turn lead to better learning.

Purpose

Although learning by moving one’s body is often regarded as active learning, not all body movements lead to better learning. To investigate the influence of different levels of body movements on learning, we developed embodied learning activities and implemented in elementary afterschool program.

Sample

Twenty-seven fifth graders (12 girls, 15 boys) for Study 1 and forty-eight fifth graders (28 girls, 20 boys) for Study 2 were recruited from afterschool programs from two public elementary schools.

Design and methods

Through two quasi-experimental studies, we compared student learning and their attitude about physics concepts. Study 1 compared learning and attitude between two groups of students depending on whether body movements correspond to knowledge representation embedded in a to-be-learned concept (congruent condition) or not (incongruent condition). In Study 2, a control group that did not engage in body movement-related learning activities, was added to observe the impact of body movement itself. Therefore, students in three groups (congruent, incongruent, no body movement group) were compared in their learning and attitude.

Results

The results from Study 1 showed that the students in the congruent group showed better learning and higher attitude in science learning than those in the incongruent groups. Study 2 showed that the congruent group showed better learning and higher attitude than other groups. Also, there was no learning difference between the incongruent group and the control group.

Conclusion

The studies showed that the students could benefit from the embodied lesson plan and the findings imply that a student’s movements are to be elaborated and mindful considering knowledge representations embedded in a concept.

Comments

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Research in Science & Technological Education on July 2022, available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2093344

Publication Title

Research in Science & Technological Education

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2093344

Included in

Education Commons

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.