Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2013
Abstract
Parrots rely heavily on vocal signals to maintain their social and mobile lifestyles. We studied vocal ontogeny in nests of wild green-rumped parrotlets (Forpus passerinus) in Venezuela. We identified three successive phases of vocal signaling that corresponded closely to three independently derived phases of physiological development. For each ontogenetic phase, we characterized the relative importance of anatomical constraints, motor skills necessary for responding to specific contexts of the immediate environment, and the learning of signals that are necessary for adult forms of communication. We observed shifts in the relative importance of these three factors as individuals progressed from one stage to the next; there was no single fixed ratio of factors that applied across the entire ontogenetic sequence. The earliest vocalizations were short in duration, as predicted from physical constraints and under-developed motor control. Calls became longer and frequency modulated during intermediate nestling ages in line with motor skills required for competitive begging. In the week before fledging, calls drastically shortened in accordance with the flight-constrained short durations of adult contact calls. The latter constraints were made evident by the demonstrated links between wing-assisted incline running, a widespread prelude to avian flight, just before the shift from long-duration begging calls to short-duration contact calls. At least in this species, the shifting emphases of factors at different ontogenetic stages precluded the morphing of intermediate-stage begging calls into adult contact calls; as shown previously, the latter are influenced by sample templates provided by parents.
Recommended Citation
Berg, K. S., Beissinger, S. R., & Bradbury, J. W. (2013). Factors shaping the ontogeny of vocal signals in a wild parrot. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 216(2), 338. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.073502
First Page
338
Last Page
345
Publication Title
Journal of Experimental Biology
DOI
10.1242/jeb.073502
Comments
© 2013 The Authors. Original published version available at https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.073502