Management Faculty Publications and Presentations
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
11-2020
Abstract
Workplace incivility refers to low-intensity negative behaviors that violate workplace norms of respect. Incivility is known to be a type of stressor in the workplace, with recent research drawing attention to how it may differentially affect employees with varying personality traits. Drawing from a stressor–strain theoretical framework, we examined the moderating effects of four of the Big Five personality traits (agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and extraversion) on the relationship between individuals’ experienced incivility and their subsequent emotional exhaustion and perpetrated incivility toward others in the organization. Results from a 2-wave survey of 252 working adults indicate that personality traits moderated the relationship between the stressor of experienced incivility and the examined strains. Agreeableness strengthened the relationship between experienced incivility and the strains examined here. On the other hand, highly conscientious employees were less likely (than employees scoring low on this trait) to perpetrate incivility toward others or become emotionally exhausted in response to experiencing incivility. No moderating effects were found for the personality traits of neuroticism and extraversion. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
Recommended Citation
Welbourne, J. L., Miranda, G., & Gangadharan, A. (2020). Effects of employee personality on the relationships between experienced incivility, emotional exhaustion, and perpetrated incivility. International Journal of Stress Management, 27(4), 335–345. https://doi.org/10.1037/str0000160
Publication Title
International Journal of Stress Management
DOI
10.1037/str0000160
Included in
Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, Human Resources Management Commons, Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods Commons
Comments
© 2020, American Psychological Association. Original published version available at https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/str0000160